Cats are Cats - splendid creatures, whether big or small are graceful and majestic.
(via:allcreatures:clusterpod:)
Cats are Cats - splendid creatures, whether big or small are graceful and majestic.
(via:allcreatures:clusterpod:)
Measuring the worth of Natural Diversity in a narrow economic sense is like measuring ‘Mona Lisa’ by the tubes of paint or the size of canvas. We wont know the worth of what we mindlessly destroy (or fail to protect) without understanding it scientifically & holistically in light of a broader value system with an inclusive attitude.
By ‘inclusive attitude’ I mean that we humans should look at ourselves as a species cohabiting and depending on many other life forms on this planet. We cant continue to think of ourselves as an exclusive species with the right to consume and exploit every possible thing (irrespective of it being unsustainable).
- Rawjeev
— Tim Berners Lee (via rodp)
— R Jagannathan (DNA, Bangalore 18-03-2010)
A pump pushing sewage at you is a good metaphor for what’s wrong with the marketplace we’ve constructed in the late 20th century. Doc has built the VRM project as a means of exploring better ways of building markets for the 21st century. Something I hadn’t considered until I was going through David Siegel’s book Pull is that “pull” is the right metaphor for this new marketplace and it’s precisely why Doc’s metaphor of a sewage pump rings so true. David’s book is about the Semantic Web and the use of data standards to enable you to “pull” the information, services, and products to you. An example from the book that really hit home for me is this: in 2010 if you order a package from Amazon, you have to give an address where it will be delivered. Wouldn’t it be better if instead, you just gave Amazon an identifier and then the package would find you at the place you wanted it to go–even if that’s the hotel you’re currently staying at? In essence, you pull the package to you with online data. This isn’t a pipe dream, but a perfectly reasonable way to think about how the world ought to work–and one that’s doable now from a technical standpoint. Doc uses different language to describe this same idea when he talks demand leading supply. The pump is all about supply leading demand. The key idea that both Doc and David would agree on here is that “If demand leads supply…, customers need to be the points of integration for their own data.”
What about those creatures that cant point fingers at what we do to them?
And what about those that don’t even understand whats happening?
-Rajeev B.
allcreatures: georgefant: (via sebseballade)
Shaping Earth:
Starting with simple ways of shaping earth for human needs of survival, we have transformed ourself into a species on which the fate of many life forms (including ourselves) depends upon.
Where we go from here, how far we go and whether we will be lonely travellers as we continue our journey, largely depends on how we shape ourselves now.
Rates of depression and anxiety among young people in America have been increasing steadily for the past fifty to seventy years. Today five to eight times as many high school and college students meet the criteria for diagnosis of major depression and/or an anxiety disorder as was true half a century or more ago
One thing we know about anxiety and depression is that they correlate significantly with people’s sense of control or lack of control over their own lives. People who believe that they are in charge of their own fate are less likely to become anxious or depressed than are those who believe that they are victims of circumstances beyond their control.
the average young person in 2002 was more External than were 80% of young people in the 1960s. The rise in Externality on Rotter’s scale over the 42-year period showed the same linear trend as did the rise in depression and anxiety.
Intrinsic goals are those that have to do with one’s own development as a person—such as becoming competent in endeavors of one’s choosing and developing a meaningful philosophy of life. Extrinsic goals, on the other hand, are those that have to do with material rewards and other people’s judgments. They include goals of high income, status, and good looks. Twenge cites evidence that young people today are, on average, more oriented toward extrinsic goals and less oriented toward intrinsic goals than they were in the past. For example, a poll conducted annually of college freshmen shows that most students today list “being well off financially” as more important to them than “developing a meaningful philosophy of life,” while the reverse was true in the 1960s and ’70s.[4]
Twenge suggests that the shift from intrinsic to extrinsic goals represents a general shift toward a culture of materialism, transmitted through television and other media. Young people are exposed from birth on to advertisements and other messages implying that happiness depends on good looks, popularity, and material goods. My guess is that Twenge is at least partly correct on this, but I am going to suggest here a further cause, which I think is even more significant and basic. My hypothesis is that the generational increases in Externality, extrinsic goals, anxiety, and depression are all caused largely by the decline, over that same period, in opportunities for free play and the increased time and weight given to schooling.
children’s freedom to play and explore on their own, independent of direct adult guidance and direction, has declined greatly in recent decades. Free play and exploration are, historically, the means by which children learn to solve their own problems, control their own lives, develop their own interests, and become competent in pursuit of their own interests.
By depriving children of opportunities to play on their own, away from direct adult supervision and control, we are depriving them of opportunities to learn how to take control of their own lives. We may think we are protecting them, but in fact we are diminishing their joy, diminishing their sense of self-control, preventing them from discovering and exploring the endeavors they would most love, and increasing the chance that they will suffer from anxiety, depression, and various other mental disorders.
Children today spend more hours per day, days per year, and years of their life in school than ever before. More weight is given to tests and grades than ever before. Outside of school children spend more time than ever before in settings where they are directed, protected, catered to, ranked, judged, and rewarded by adults. In all of these settings adults are in control, not children.
School is also a place where children have little choice about with whom they can associate. They are herded into spaces filled with other children that they did not choose, and they must spend a good portion of each school day in those spaces. In free play, children who feel harassed or bullied can leave the situation and find another group that is more compatible; but in school they cannot.
The lowest levels of happiness by far (surprise, surprise) occurred when children were at school, and the highest levels occurred when they were out of school and conversing or playing with friends. Time spent with parents fell in the middle of the happiness-unhappiness range. Average happiness increased on weekends, but then plummeted from late Sunday afternoon through the evening, in anticipation of the coming school week.
So, yes, as a culture we have become more work and success focused. This is reflected in increased time for schooling and decreased free time which makes people feel like they’ve lost control, and so depression and anxiety increase…. coupled with advertising which also makes them look to external things for happiness….
As a culture, we need to recognize this problem and correct it. We need to put more emphasis on people finding their own happiness and less time trying to corral everyone into the rat race.
This is also reflected in Obama’s anal push for even time spent in school - I always thought the best lessons were learned outside of school.
thx maximelagace:
— Tom Robbins
Python, Ruby, Scala & Groovy are all unexplored frontiers to me. I’m wondering what is worth giving a shot during tea-time for a few days. I have a friend who swears by Python but, going by my first impressions about these languages I just left out, Groovy and Python (I may be wrong but, It doesn’t matter much to me).
Now I need to choose between Ruby & Scala.
Any Suggestions?